[Bug 1081504] Re: Extras apps do not use the provided icon
Michael Nelson
1081504 at bugs.launchpad.net
Mon Dec 3 10:34:09 UTC 2012
Hi David,
This seems not to be a bug, but re-open if you find otherwise. The issue
afaics is that it's published in extras with the package name 'postman-
image-uploader' (correct), but sca/devportal has been told the package
name is 'postman' (wrong, but it may have been uploaded to a PPA with
that name in the past?). You can see this in the exported data from sca
[1] which is imported into apps.ubuntu.com with the wrong packagename
but the correct icon/screenshot [2].
It is not obvious from the devportal entry that this is the case, as it
is not yet displaying the uploaded package name, but it will be
displayed once the fix for bug 1084180 is deployed. Anthony should be
able to fix this data issue quite simply in the /admin/ UI (the other
option being to re-review the app, setting the correct package name).
[1] http://software-center.ubuntu.com/api/2.0/applications/en/ubuntu/precise/i386/
[2] https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applications/postman/
** Changed in: ubuntu-webcatalog
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Application Review Board, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1081504
Title:
Extras apps do not use the provided icon
Status in Ubuntu web catalog:
Invalid
Bug description:
This is a follow-up from bug 1010655, as one of the issues pointed out
there is still not fixed.
For apps published in extras.ubuntu.com, the icon provided by the
developer seems not to be used, which causes Software Center to use a
generic icon for the app upon installation.
Here's an example of a recent upload (see the generic icon used instead of the 64px one provided [1]):
https://apps.ubuntu.com/cat/applications/postman-image-uploader/
[1] https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/1612/
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-webcatalog/+bug/1081504/+subscriptions
More information about the App-review-board
mailing list