Deciding on criteria of requirements on next round of recruitments.

[Bhavani Shankar R]

On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Andrew Mitchell <ajmitch at ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:05:13PM +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Bhavani Shankar R <bhavi at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>> > Dear All,
>> >
>> > As a fall back from the previous arb meeting, Since we are 3 members
>> > right now out of the full strength 7 members in the team, we thought
>> > it would be good to go in for another round of recruitment to the
>> > team.
>> >
>> > Below was the criteria used in the previous round:
>> >
>> > ideal candidates would be a ubuntu developer with endorsement from one
>> > of the ubuntu developers and have some, interest/experience in things
>> > like creating new lintian checks, generating apparmor profiles, or
>> > otherwise improving the tools to assist package reviews. Experience in
>> > MOTU, Core Dev, Archive Admin, Backports, DMB, or Debian
>> > Developer/Maintainer would be considered a plus, but not required.
>> >
>> > (Unfortunately, it turned out to be a poor response receiving 2
>> > applications last time around)
>> >
>> > Any inputs/feedback on the above criteria welcome.
>> >
>>
>> Hi Andrew/Alessio,
>>
>> Any feedback appreciated :-)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>
> The criteria used last time are fine to re-use, I think being an ubuntu
> developer is a requirement, all other criteria are just nice to have.
>
> Andrew

Thanks Andrew. I'll get in touch with TB members and post a call for
applications soon. Do you think its the right time to call for
applications keeping in view the holiday season coming up?

Regards,

-- 
Bhavani Shankar
Ubuntu Developer       |  www.ubuntu.com
https://launchpad.net/~bhavi