[apparmor] Nominate r1404 for 2.5.2 for subdomain regression tests on 64bit

[Steve Beattie]

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 01:15:58PM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> Steve and I found that the subdomain regression test suite was failing
> unexpectedly on amd64 in the 2.5 series because it lacks commit r1404
> from trunk:
> 
> revno: 1404
> committer: Steve Beattie <sbeattie at ubuntu.com>
> branch nick: master
> timestamp: Tue 2010-04-27 02:37:30 -0700
> message:
>   First, readlink is in /bin/ on ubuntu, not /usr/bin - checked both
>   paths. Secondly, the /lib64 -> /lib symlink would mean the
>   /lib64/ld-linux symlink would incorrectly be generated as
>   /lib64/ld-N.NN.so which still has a symlink in its path, and thus
>   apparmor wouldn't permit the access. Fixing by having readlink
>   canonicalize the entire path.
>   
> With this patch, the subdomain regression tests fail in the same manner
> as with 2.5 on earlier kernels (eg Ubuntu 10.04).

ACK from me. WRT the regression tests, I'd also like to nominate the
following trunk commits for 2.5.2:

revno: 1452
committer: Kees Cook <kees.cook at canonical.com>
branch nick: master
timestamp: Wed 2010-08-04 12:22:48 -0700
message:
  Fixes "deleted" test case to match the documentation for the expected
  outcome. Adds additional positive test, fixes spelling.

revno: 1442
committer: Kees Cook <kees.cook at canonical.com>
branch nick: master
timestamp: Mon 2010-07-26 10:50:33 -0700
message:
  Fixes several warnings, typos, clarifies a subtest description and starts
  to try to get rid of programmatic use of $Id$ in kernel regression tests.

revno: 1505
committer: Steve Beattie <sbeattie at ubuntu.com>
branch nick: master
timestamp: Thu 2010-09-30 10:49:26 -0700
message:
  This patch modifies the xattr regression test to use a separate
  loopback mounted filesystem to operate on, to guarantee that the mount
  option user_xattr is enabled (it's disabled by default on Ubuntu).

  With this change, a number of the user xattr testcases that were
  expected to pass but weren't started working; however, some of the
  ones that were failing as expected are now passing. I've touched up
  the expectations as well.

Thanks.
-- 
Steve Beattie
<sbeattie at ubuntu.com>
http://NxNW.org/~steve/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/attachments/20100930/037f0819/attachment.pgp