[apparmor] alias rules broken for /{,var/}run/

[Christian Boltz]

Hello,

Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011 schrieb Steve Beattie:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 03:20:15PM -0400, John Johansen wrote:
> > On 11/01/2011 02:10 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > > That said: How big is the risk that your patch breaks
> > > something else? If the risk is low, take it for 2.7.
> > > Otherwise commit it after the 2.7 release and give it some
> > > testing.
> > 
> > There is certainly risk, the patch will be fairly large I am guess
> > on the order of several hundred lines of code.  It would have to
> > come with regression tests.
> > 
> > Right now I am of the mind that we fix it in the dev branch, and
> > then we can consider back porting it for 2.7.1
> 
> That is my inclination as well.

You are the experts when it comes to the parser code, and if you both 
think there is a risk of breaking something, I won't object to delaying 
the fix for 2.7.1.

I can workaround the issue with modified profiles until then.


Regards,

Christian Boltz
-- 
Bist Du etwa auch dafür so wie die Araber aus allen Wörtern die 
Vokale wegzulassen? Das schreibt sich sicherlich extrem effizient. 
dr bst D d ndrr nscht? Knnst D nch vrsthn, ws ch schrb? Mn sllt lls 
br dn Hfn wrfn nd sch wdr w d Stnztmnschn ntrhltn: AAArgh Ugh 
*Keule schwing* *platthau*.
Na, fandest Du das angenehm zu lesen? War auf jeden Fall sehr 
effizient zu schreiben!     [Philipp Zacharias in suse-linux]