[apparmor] DBus rule syntax for subject and peer components
Jamie Strandboge
jamie at canonical.com
Thu Jun 20 20:42:46 UTC 2013
On 06/20/2013 01:41 PM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> Proposals that were decisively approved through voting:
>
> * Proposal 3.1 - Change subj= to subject=
> * Proposal 3.2 - Move the access to the front
>
Progress!
>
> * Revised Proposal 3 - subject=() and peer=()
>
> dbus [acquire] [<bus>] [subject=(<subject>)],
> dbus [send | receive] [<bus>] [subject=(<subject>)] [peer=(<peer>)],
> * Revised Proposal 3.5 - subject {} and peer {}
>
> dbus [acquire] [<bus>] [subject {<subject>}],
> dbus [send | receive] [<bus>] [subject {<subject>}] [peer {<peer>}],
>
I'm fine with both of these but prefer 3 slightly even though 3.5 is
prettier in simpler cases for the reasons Tyler mentioned. That said, I
am fine with 3.5 if people strongly prefer it.
--
Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/attachments/20130620/b6c79280/attachment.pgp>
More information about the AppArmor
mailing list