[apparmor] [patch] utils: add python coverage generation
Christian Boltz
apparmor at cboltz.de
Mon Nov 3 20:04:32 UTC 2014
Hello,
Am Montag, 3. November 2014 schrieb Seth Arnold:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 03:04:04PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > Now that we have correct dependencies, does it still make sense to
> > add coverage* to .PHONY?
>
> The .PHONY marking indicates that the target doesn't actually create a
> file named after the target; so if there's no 'coverage' file created
> as part of the 'coverage' target, then .PHONY should still include
> 'coverage'.
Ah, right - there's a difference between "coverage" and ".coverage" ;-)
OK, forget my question about .PHONY ;-)
Regards,
Christian Boltz
--
[lange Antwort schreib] [begreif] [lange falsche Antwort lösch]
Genial.
[Ratti in fontlinge-devel]
More information about the AppArmor
mailing list