[apparmor] [patch] C tools: rename __unused macro

[Seth Arnold]

On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 05:07:40AM -0700, Steve Beattie wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:59:43AM -0700, Steve Beattie wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:36:55AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> > > What do people think about using just the bare word?
> > >   unused
> > 
> > I'm fine with either the bare word or Cameron's AA_unused suggestion.
> 
> In the interests of moving things along, I created patches with both
> the former and the latter; they are attached. No changes from the
> prior patch other than the mechanical s/__unused/{AA_,}unused/g change.
> 
> I vote the color of the bikeshed to be mauve.

Acked-by: Seth Arnold <seth.arnold at canonical.com>

on them both :) because I'd like this shed painted quickly. What's faster
than two paintbrushes in two hands with two colours of paint?

I prefer AA_unused.

Thanks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/apparmor/attachments/20141002/84269c03/attachment.pgp>