[apparmor] [PATCH 4/4] libapparmor: Provide privately exported aa_is_blacklisted() through swig

[Christian Boltz]

Hello,

Am Dienstag, 16. Juni 2015 schrieb Tyler Hicks:
> On 2015-06-16 13:14:15, Christian Boltz wrote:

> > BTW: The function definition is
> > 
> >     int _aa_is_blacklisted(const char *name, const char *path)
> > 
> > but "path" is never used inside the function. Is this intentional?
> 
> Nice catch. No, it isn't intentional. I'll fix it in a follow up patch
> and will include the rational in the commit message.

Thanks!

> There's an additional follow up patch that I'll also be sending that
> prevents crazy exceptions from being raised by
> LibAppArmor._aa_is_blacklisted() in some situations.
>
> Do I have your ACK on this patch?

With my limited C knownledge, I hesitate to ack any C or C++ patches 
that do more than updating a comment or fixing a typo in a string ;-)

However, this patch looks simple enough, so I'll accept the risk ;-) and 
say
    Acked-by: Christian Boltz <apparmor at cboltz.de>


Regards,

Christian Boltz
-- 
Immerwieder der gleiche Anfaengerfehler:
/dev/null ist fuer Backup,
/dev/zero ist fuer Restore.
[J. P. Meier]