[apparmor] [PATCH] parser: add basic support for parallel compiles and loads

[John Johansen]

On 11/20/2015 05:19 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 04:35:20PM -0800, John Johansen wrote:
>> Do you really think, this 1 little condition tucked away is that much more
>> maintenance? The way it is set up, it is completely transparent to the
>> rest of the code.  That is we can delete it and the rest of the code doesn't
>> need to change.
> 
> Well, if you feel strongly enough that we should keep it, how about
> adding a comment near work_sync_one() that it shouldn't be used directly?
> work_sync() knows how to avoid the case I'm worried about.
> 
sure