[apparmor] [PATCH 06/13] nfsd: switch purge_old() to use start_removing_noperm()
NeilBrown
neilb at ownmail.net
Wed Feb 4 04:57:50 UTC 2026
From: NeilBrown <neil at brown.name>
Rather than explicit locking, use the start_removing_noperm() and
end_removing() wrappers.
This was not done with other start_removing changes due to conflicting
in-flight patches.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil at brown.name>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
index 441dfbfe2d2b..52fbe723a3c8 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4recover.c
@@ -351,16 +351,14 @@ purge_old(struct dentry *parent, char *cname, struct nfsd_net *nn)
if (nfs4_has_reclaimed_state(name, nn))
goto out_free;
- inode_lock_nested(d_inode(parent), I_MUTEX_PARENT);
- child = lookup_one(&nop_mnt_idmap, &QSTR(cname), parent);
+ child = start_removing_noperm(parent, &QSTR(cname));
if (!IS_ERR(child)) {
status = vfs_rmdir(&nop_mnt_idmap, d_inode(parent), child, NULL);
if (status)
printk("failed to remove client recovery directory %pd\n",
child);
- dput(child);
}
- inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
+ end_removing(child);
out_free:
kfree(name.data);
--
2.50.0.107.gf914562f5916.dirty
More information about the AppArmor
mailing list