[apparmor] Re: [PATCH 03/13] libfs: change simple_done_creating() to use end_creating()

[NeilBrown]

On Thu, 05 Feb 2026, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-02-04 at 15:57 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > From: NeilBrown <neil at brown.name>
> > 
> > simple_done_creating() and end_creating() are identical.
> > So change the former to use the latter.  This further centralises
> > unlocking of directories.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil at brown.name>
> > ---
> >  fs/libfs.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/libfs.c b/fs/libfs.c
> > index f1860dff86f2..db18b53fc189 100644
> > --- a/fs/libfs.c
> > +++ b/fs/libfs.c
> > @@ -2318,7 +2318,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_start_creating);
> >  /* parent must have been held exclusive since simple_start_creating() */
> >  void simple_done_creating(struct dentry *child)
> >  {
> > -	inode_unlock(child->d_parent->d_inode);
> > -	dput(child);
> > +	end_creating(child);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(simple_done_creating);
> 
> nit: seems like it would be better to turn this into a static inline

True ... but then it could have been a static inline anyway.
I'd rather not change it without good reason, or knowing what it was
written that way.

Al: do you have an opinion on this?

Thanks,
NeilBrown