[announce] bzrweb seems a bit finished

[Chris McCormick]

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:30:06AM -0500, John A Meinel wrote:
> Chris McCormick wrote:
> > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:17:02PM -0500, John A Meinel wrote:
> > 
> >>selected version, to me a plain diff is the diff *for* this revision. I
> >>suppose you could make them both diff vs something since we seem to have
> >>mixed understanding of what a plain diff means.
> > 
> > 
> > I've fixed this and a couple of other bugs, and merged Lalo's server +
> > rst patches. Unfortunately it's broken against the latest pull of bzr.dev
> > from Martin. I guess I'll get onto that.
> 
> I would still like to see the currently selected entry have a
> [diff vs <prev>]. But generally it looks good.

You're right of course. I've fixed this.

Bzrweb is working against the latest bzr.dev as well, however I think
there may be some issues with locking files not owned by the Apache
user again because the lock_mode argument was removed from the Branch
constructor. So if people can't run Apache as a user who has write
access to their bzrweb shared bzr repositories (or more specifically the
branch-lock file), then I suggest they run bzrwebserver.py on a high
port as the user who owns their bzr repository, and do some kind of
apache proxying.

There is tons of documentation on the net about using mod_rewrite,
mod_redirect, and/or mod_proxy to run Zope behind Apache, and all of
this applies to bzrweb.

Your repository is no longer locked if you are running bzrwebserver.

Best,

Chris.

-------------------
chris at mccormick.cx
http://mccormick.cx
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050601/f1b95c39/attachment.pgp