plans for 0.0.6 release

[Jamie Wilkinson]

This one time, at band camp, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 16:22, John A Meinel wrote:
>> It would be nice to have the revision separator worked out before
>> reaching a sort of milestone release. But that is pretty minimal.
>>
>> If we have the revision separator, I think getting "bzr diff" to support
>> doing a diff against 2 revisions is pretty trivial. Since you at least
>> merged the -r 10:20 patch, you probably could do the bzr diff -r 10:20
>> patch.
>
>Well if "-r 10:20" goes in to 0.0.6 I'll definitely have to fork bzr. Should I 
>call it OpenBzr or FreeBzr? I've got it! NoColonsHereBzr! ;D

Make it something easier to type than "bzr", preferably using characters
only in the home row, or our favourite letters in english: 't' and 'e'.

How about 'teh'.  ;-)

(suddenly the potential for marketing to the IM kids opens wide, with
command names like 'teh diffz', 'teh commitz', 'teh suck')