[PLUGIN] bzr changeset now support rollup changesets (and bzr send-changeset)

[John A Meinel]

Aaron Bentley wrote:
...

>
> >I think it is a decent validation check to send the 'inventory_sha1' in
> >the changeset.
>
>
> I think it would make sense to move revfiles to having fileid/revisionid
> text_ids, instead of accessing by SHA1.  I believe that sending the SHA1
> in the changeset would, in general, be considered 'too much gunk'.
>
> >It also means that you could validate part of a changeset without having
> >the "base" tree available. Which again seems worthwhile.
>
>
> You'd only be able to validate new files, which doesn't seem like it
> outweighs the 'too much gunk' issue.

Sorry, I think you missed what I was mentioning. This last portion is
passing the <revision inventory_sha1=""> value, not the sha sum of the text.
I switched to talking about the information in the revision header.
I would like to be able to re-create the revision xml directly from the
changeset, without having to recompute the inventory. That would allow
me to validate a changeset before I go to all the work of regenerating
the inventory, only to find that neither one is correct.

John
=:->

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20050629/902bba1a/attachment.pgp