[Request] Remote operation need to be cached

[James Blackwell]

> Alexander Belchenko wrote:
> >I'm trying to use bzr pull because rsyncing for this BIG repository is 
> >very long operation.
  
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 09:15:54AM -0500, John A Meinel wrote:
> rsyncing is going to be *way* faster than bzr pull. Usually 5-10x. Like 
> rsyncing the bzr.dev tree takes < 3 min, but bzr pull it takes about 
> 17min for me.
> 
> There is some discussion about CentralizedStorage which would be sort of 
> a local cache.
> 

The last time I heard this issue seriously discussed, centralized storage
was practically a given. Other than Doing It, the thing standing in the
way is defining clearly how to prune out less valuable data from the
cache.

> I'm not sure how it would work with the new weaves, though.
> 

Excellent question.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051004/12b452cb/attachment.pgp