compressed weaves, and revision.weave
Michael Ellerman
michael at ellerman.id.au
Fri Oct 28 04:40:40 BST 2005
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:33, John A Meinel wrote:
> Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 17:00, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> A whole lot of useless junk
> >> ...
> >> Actually it doesn't look so bad when you run it a few times, I've got a
> >> fair amount of RAM so I'm probably caching the whole tree.
> >
> > Ooops. Those numbers yesterday were on a format 7 branch, but not
> > compressed, so they're all bogus. I'll try and get some compressed
> > numbers today sometime.
>
> Thanks.
> I would be curious to compare format 6 versus 7 compressed and
> uncompressed.
OK, well the numbers from yesterday are valid then, the cbzr numbers are all
format 7 uncompressed.
Numbers for format 7 compressed:
concordia ~/src/work/ckexec$ time $cbzr st
real 6m40.589s <-------- WOW
user 0m23.455s
sys 0m4.864s
concordia ~/src/work/ckexec$ time $cbzr st
real 0m18.522s
user 0m12.267s
sys 0m1.638s
concordia ~/src/work/ckexec$ time $cbzr st
real 0m14.640s
user 0m12.152s
sys 0m1.528s
concordia ~/src/work/ckexec$ time $cbzr st
real 0m15.350s
user 0m12.034s
sys 0m1.564s
concordia ~/src/work/ckexec$ time $cbzr --profile st
modified:
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c
arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c
arch/powerpc/mm/lmb.c
patches/ftr_early_param-earlier
unknown:
.bzr.backup
.shelf
ftr_vpa-unregister
test.py
1589353 function calls (1535865 primitive calls) in 14.876 CPU seconds
Ordered by: cumulative time
List reduced from 228 to 20 due to restriction <20>
ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function)
1 0.000 0.000 14.876 14.876 commands.py:193(run_argv)
1 0.000 0.000 14.876 14.876 commands.py:501(ignore_pipe)
1 0.037 0.037 14.876 14.876 builtins.py:87(run)
1 0.000 0.000 14.838 14.838 status.py:24(show_status)
1 0.834 0.834 6.677 6.677 delta.py:138(compare_trees)
37096 0.474 0.000 4.017 0.000 inventory.py:553(_read_tree_state)
1 0.000 0.000 3.775 3.775 branch.py:1020(basis_tree)
1 0.000 0.000 3.775 3.775 branch.py:996(revision_tree)
1 0.000 0.000 3.775 3.775 branch.py:853(get_revision_inventory)
1 0.000 0.000 3.774 3.774 branch.py:834(get_inventory)
2 0.002 0.001 3.313 1.656 status.py:102(list_paths)
1 0.139 0.139 2.781 2.781 workingtree.py:322(iter_conflicts)
1 0.000 0.000 2.642 2.642 branch.py:839(get_inventory_xml)
19716 0.130 0.000 2.569 0.000 workingtree.py:324(<generator expression>)
19716 0.125 0.000 2.439 0.000 workingtree.py:243(list_files)
1 0.000 0.000 2.346 2.346 branch.py:830(get_inventory_weave)
1 0.000 0.000 2.346 2.346 weave.py:102(get_weave)
1 0.000 0.000 2.346 2.346 weavefile.py:95(read_weave)
1 0.200 0.200 2.346 2.346 weavefile.py:99(read_weave_v5)
72016/19716 0.933 0.000 2.314 0.000 workingtree.py:255(descend)
real 1m19.525s
user 0m49.085s
sys 0m24.206s
> Also, if you could just do a "wc -l" against the inventory.weave
> (naturally you would need to uncompress the compressed format 7).
Format 7:
concordia ~/src/work/ckexec$ zcat .bzr/inventory.weave.gz | wc -l
46050
Format 6:
concordia ~/src/work/ckexec$ wc -l ../kexec/.bzr/inventory.weave
24990 ../kexec/.bzr/inventory.weave
> I'm curious if what you are seeing is because the inventory.weave file
> simply has almost 2x the lines in it.
Could be, it's pretty close to 2x.
> Thanks for your performance testing. Is there somewhere that you could
> put the inventory.weave(.gz) file? I was thinking to test python's gzip
> versus native gzip for a large, real-life file.
No wozzers.
Weave is at:
http://michael.ellerman.id.au/files/inventory.weave.gz
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
IBM OzLabs
email: michael:ellerman.id.au
inmsg: mpe:jabber.org
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051028/3ea2ff12/attachment.pgp
More information about the bazaar
mailing list