What we did at UBZ

[Martin Pool]

On 17 Nov 2005, Erik Bågfors <zindar at gmail.com> wrote:
> I can understand both ways.  Personally I prefer the .bzr thing.  I
> don't want to have that in the way.  But it gets really strange when
> you "bzr push" to a new repo (which is another thread... :) ) and you
> get no working directory.   Then it looks like it just created a dir
> and nothing in it.

I agree that's very undesirable behaviour.  Much better to either build
the working directory (though that will be slow and painful without a
remote server) or use a branch with no working copy.

-- 
Martin