status lists with nested working trees

[Martin Pool]

On 20 Nov 2005, Robert Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 15:49 +1100, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > With nested trees, like so:
> > 
> >   foo/
> >     .bzr/
> >     bar/
> >       .bzr/
> > 
> > a bzr status within foo reports bar as unknown.  Is this correct?  Old
> > bazaar and tla worked out that bar was under different revision control, and
> > didn't report it as unknown.  (Actually I don't know what it thought about
> > bar at all, but it didn't make bzr status so chatty.)

I think it'd be nice if status reported them as sub-trees, or some
similar name.

> 
> In addition to Johns message, a good first step towards this is making a
> new inventory entry class of 'working tree' (which refines directory).

That'd be good, but would seem to imply that you'd need to add them by
hand.  jaq's reasonable question is what should happen if they're just
their without being added or ignored.

-- 
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051123/09917dd0/attachment.pgp