sftp oddities

[John Arbash Meinel]

Aaron Bentley wrote:
> John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> 
>>>>Hmmm.  It says "WARNING", which doesn't sound like behavior that is
>>>>supposed to occur.  If that is incorrect then maybe it can be my first
>>>>patch :-)
>>>
>>>
>>>Well, we could downgrade it from a warning. bzr doesn't support remote
>>>working directories, because it may have to do merging, which can
>>>generate conflicts, and you don't generally have a way to resolve them.
> 
> 
> I think we can get rid of it completely if there's no working directory
> to update.  If there's a working tree on the remote branch, then we
> should issue the warning.
> 
> Aaron

I agree completely. We just need to get trees without working
directories. I had one before we created push (my push would fail to
push to a directory with a working tree if it couldn't update it).
Robert's push was made official, and we never re-introduced missing
working trees. (I think Robert was working on cleaning up the code to
create future checkouts).

John
=:->
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20051220/f0e13373/attachment.pgp