going with init-repo for now

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 01:18 -0500, James Blackwell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 07:37:18PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> > Just a note, I'm going to go with 'init-repo' as the command for now on
> > the following rationale:
> > 
> >  Martin is ok with it as a starting point, though sub commands might be
> > better in the long run. (bzr repository create for instance).
> > 
> >  Like create-repository it will be a top level and visible command.
> > 
> >  It made sense to use 'init' as a prefix as we use 'init' for a very
> > similar thing already.
> 
> I'm happy with that. I would have gone with "init --repo" and "init
> --branch" with "init --branch" being the default. Was this considered?

Yes. Until we have the current long debate really bedded down I wanted a
simple place to put the logic, that won't muddy up the existing init
which is really rather different (what would 'init --default-no-trees'
mean ?) and which can mention 'repository' in the output of 'bzr help'.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060215/410f6f6d/attachment.pgp