'upgrade' should 'check' ?

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 22:24 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote:
> Robert Collins wrote:
> > I wonder if it makes sense to have a mandatory 'check' occur when
> > upgrading ?
> > 
> > Rob
> > 
> 
> Are you saying it should check before or after? I think running 'check'
> after would make sense. And consider it 'failed' if check doesn't pass.

Running it before would let us ensure that the weave ancestry graph is
correct and so forth. That would make the logic in 'upgrade' be simpler
in some cases.

Rob

-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060223/48b2c97d/attachment.pgp