Documents, in bzr or wiki

[Martin Pool]

On 16 May 2006, Erik Bågfors <zindar at gmail.com> wrote:

> Exactly, which is why I would like to keep it in the bzr tree.  Only a
> few people have commit access there. A few people would have to
> approve of the documentation, as is currently with code.  This doesn't
> have to be the same people, but the same process.  It works very well
> for code.

I'd like the main documentation to be in the tree for all these reasons.
James did some good work in the past by gathering up existing
documentation into a patch.

-- 
Martin