[MERGE/RFC] Add dotted-decimal revision numbers to merge_sorted output

[Robert Collins]

On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:12 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> 
> So, if I understand correctly, the nodes appear in the order that they
> were merged into the target revision, which makes them stable.  But
> nodes which have not are not ancestors of a given revision have no
> revno
> with respect to that revision, because they were not merged by it.
> 
> Is that right? 

completely.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20060908/34d23895/attachment.pgp