Mention Bazaar NG in the old bazaar package description?

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 15:52 +0200, Dennis Benzinger wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> The description of the old bazaar (Arch rewrite) package says:
> 
> "Unless you have a pressing reason to use bazaar you should use some other
> revision control system as upstream development has ceased."
> 
> Wouldn't it be better if suggested to use Bazaar(-NG) instead and said that
> with BzrTools the existing bazaar branches can be imported?
> 
> Otherwise people may think that the development of Bazaar-NG has ceased. 
> Especially because the homepage link in the package description of bazaar
> points to the Bazaar-NG website.
> 
> Should I write to the bazaar package maintainer about this?

Please do.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070510/57f66f5d/attachment.pgp