Is it obvious whether pyrex extensions are in use?

[Robert Collins]

On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 13:00 +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 8/8/07, James Westby <jw+debian at jameswestby.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > If a user submits a bug report it may be useful to know whether they are
> > using pyrex extensions or not. I guess this is obvious if a traceback
> > contains the extension, but is it obvious otherwise? Should it be made
> > more prominent?
> 
> We could have a line like
> 
>   using native extensions: knit, blah, blah
> 
> shown in --version and the user-visible traceback.

I like that. Rather than native, perhaps 'C' is more clear.

-Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20070808/39d0918b/attachment.pgp