Bazaar is ignored in some places?

[Alexander Belchenko]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Arbash Meinel пишет:
> Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> Am Samstag, den 08.12.2007, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Alexander Belchenko:
>>> I found that in some places Bazaar specially or not but ignored.
>>>
>>> 1) http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
>>> Well known comparison between various SCM. Bazaar (as well as git) is not mentioned at all.
>>> Many people point to this table, although I don't see any real profit from it.
>> I think simply that (missing git and bzr) indicates how old that table
>> is. Perhaps we could ask the author to get it updated?
> 
> I believe the author of that table has been asked to update. But refuses to
> believe that "bzr" is anything different from Arch, since Bazaar was once a
> fork of Arch, before -ng was written.

The page claims it was updated March 9, 2007.
I may be should not bother about this comparison, because all comparison sucks,
but when someone try to using such pages as argument in the dispute, then...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHWuHazYr338mxwCURAjIHAJ9U7jAkMmDZS0OI+FShA8txR+optQCcD46j
w005gqN0H7Q9SPPm5+OkqIo=
=7NB+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----