No subject

output the latest 10 revisions from my branch.

Again, I am just wondering...
Now that I am an experienced user, I use an alias like "bzr -log --f
-rlast:10.." but it does not feel like it Just Works.

Any thought to share?
And as a side note: congratulations for the 1.0 milestone, I have now the
final argument to convince my manager :-)

Regards.

------=_Part_430_2558363.1197629987511
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,<br><br>I am confused with the usage of &#39;log&#39; command, when combining options &#39;forward&#39; and &#39;limit&#39;.<br><br>First, using bzr from command-line, I find the &#39;forward / --f&#39; option mandatory as soon as my branch exceeds 50 revisions: I am usually more interested in the log of my latest revisions, and it seems more logical to me in that chronological order.
<br>Am I the only one? Could it not be the default ordering, with replacement of option &#39;forward&#39; with option &#39;backward&#39;? (just wondering...).<br><br>What&#39;s more confusing to me is that, always using &quot;bzr log --f&quot;, I have no use for option &#39;--limit=X&#39;, as it limits the revision output to the first X revisions.
<br>From a system that Just Works :-) I would expect &#39;bzr log --f --limit=10&#39; to output the latest 10 revisions from my branch.<br><br>Again, I am just wondering...<br>Now that I am an experienced user, I use an alias like &quot;bzr -log --f -rlast:10..&quot; but it does not feel like it Just Works.
<br><br>Any thought to share?<br>And as a side note: congratulations for the 1.0 milestone, I have now the final argument to convince my manager :-)<br><br>Regards.<br>

------=_Part_430_2558363.1197629987511--