[MERGE] Fix reconfiguring standalone tree to lightweight checkout

[Aaron Bentley]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ian Clatworthy wrote:

> Perhaps I'm being overly pedantic but I think we need to do more in our
> documentation to differentiate between normal checkouts and lightweight
> ones.

Ever since we've decided to term them "checkouts" instead of "bound
branches", we've considered that behavioural differences between
lightweight checkouts and normal checkouts are bugs. I think that would
be movement in the wrong direction.

> Unless you disagree, I think we ought to black-ban the term "heavyweight
> checkout" as well. We should consciously say either lightweight or
> normal, where the latter might be deep (now) or might be shallow (soon).

I disagree quite a lot.

Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHYnxJ0F+nu1YWqI0RAp2nAKCAjDQl9csfX7wq7Upm/9VLEC+hGgCfd2AW
NEZFeGykqUSiZ4K3nHESN2Y=
=s1hU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----