display of merged revisions in loggerhead and log

[Martin Pool]

> So what do you think of the attached then?

I like it.

Displaying the branch nick is very good, though I wonder if the
particular way it is shown here may be taken to mean that eg 3221.1.13
of "prepare-1.2" was merged, which will not generally be true.

I dislike the different font sizes, and think that just weight and
color is enough to distinguish them.

At the implementation layer, maybe later on the folding could be done
by inserting blocks that are sent later in the document, so that the
initial overview appears more quickly.

The 'description' field seems redundant?

The 'files' link over on the right seems unclear in purpose.  Does it
take me to a view of the tree in that revision?  In that case 'tree'
might be a better name.  Also it's unclear what clicking the modified
files will give.

-- 
Martin