Plans for Loggerhead

[Martin Albisetti]

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Robert Collins
<robertc at robertcollins.net> wrote:
> I think it does already, meantime-wise. The problem is that this only
> applies if you get all 20K revision numbers at once :(.

That's good news if we did cache them in out revision graph sqlite table :p


> The current numbering scheme is able to partially number without
> accessing full history - and numbers near head are assigned more
> quickly.

Does that apply to dotted revnos as well?
if it's "branch7.revision_id_to_revno", then it doesn't  :(


-- 
Martin