Why Bazaar is not used in many project hosting sites?

[Toshio Kuratomi]

Marius Kruger wrote:
> 2009/5/10 Ben Finney <ben+bazaar at benfinney.id.au>:
>> Marius Kruger <amanic at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> 2009/5/9 Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger at gmail.com>:
>>>> loggerhead has matured but we have to get some time to get it
>>>> running with mod_wsgi, test it on our servers (we had to move off of
>>>> mod_python which interferes with mod_wsgi),
>> […]
>>
>>> I was quite successful with mod_fcgi (for my needs), have you
>>> considered that?
> Sorry Toshio, I was half asleep when I wrote that, I use mod_fcgi
> for bzr+https:// access not for loggerhead. For loggerhead I'm
> using mod_proxy which works great for me.
> 
Ah okay.  We presently run a mixture of mod_proxy and mod_wsgi on our
application servers for the main Fedora applications.  But fedorahosted
is all apache (keep it simple with less daemons).  So we/I just have to
get some time to get make loggerhead with mod_wsgi work.

>> FastCGI is not free software (its license restricts redistribution to
>> only for certain purposes), which is a significant factor for many
>> sites.
> 
> I don't know about mod_fastcgi, but mod_fcgi is GPL AFAICT:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/mod-fcgid/  (click on 'Details')
> http://fastcgi.coremail.cn/download.htm
> 

This was my impression too.  I've been confused by the difference in the
past.

-Toshio

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090510/059b3c27/attachment.pgp