merge 2.0.0 -> 2.0 ?

[Martin Pool]

Yes, John's correct.

On Sep 25, 2009 1:02 PM, "John Arbash Meinel" <john at arbash-meinel.com>
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote: > For clarity, should we merge 2.0.x release branches
to 2.0, as we merge > 2...
I believe that is the plan.

A 2.x.y branch can always be merged into the 2.x branch (whenever a
developer feels it should be done.) And the 2.x branch can always be
merged into bzr.dev (again depending on someone caring enough to do it.)

I was planning on following through with some of that now that 2.0.0 is
final, unless someone beats me to it.

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkq8MoEACgkQJdeBCYSNAAMGIACfSTAQuMuDqW/WkbA6EhMXGpnH
ic4An18+YWUFS4CZgXBjMhC/t0z5DeAB
=8+ZF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090925/1a72205a/attachment-0002.htm