Updated Plugins Guide - questions and RFT

[Robert Collins]

On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 12:50 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:

> > I urge you to federate this data directly into the plugins in the first
> > place: we've written approximately all the code to do this already.
> 
> There are at least two issues with that I know of:
> 
> 1. We still need a list of plugin branch URLs *somewhere* so we can
>    fetch them to get the rest of the data.

Yes; for this perhaps a comment in the wiki - I'd actually like to see
the wiki page become machine updated. Or something. I agree we need a
url somewhere to bootstrap the process.

I think it should be community editable, so that the editor doesn't need
to do anything to get new plugins added.

> 2. We have around 100 plugins and I don't have write access to most
>    of them.

Well, this one is fairly solvable ;P - submit patches, and pull from a
patched branch until they are accepted ;).

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20090928/930bc92d/attachment-0002.pgp