Loggerhead question

[Matt Nordhoff]

Russel Winder wrote:
> Matt,
> 
> I just downloaded the Loggerhead 1.17 tarball by accident but then I
> thought I would take a peek.  I notice that the manual file for
> serve-branches reports this as Loggerhead 1.6 from August 2008.  The
> other manual files have analogous issues.

Oh, you're right, the manpages are out-of-date.

Could you please file a bug? Or I can if you don't want to.

Anyway, it makes us look sloppy, but it doesn't actually cause
*problems*. Use "serve-branches -h" to see up-to-date information about
the options it supports.
--