Question about features

[Daniel Carrera]

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Maarten Bosmans <mkbosmans at gmail.com> wrote:
> This really sound like you would be better of doing the fix for B on a
> separate bugfix branch. Is there any specific reason you have for
> mixing revisions for feature A and B, or am I just misunderstanding
> your workflow?

For small changes I can't be bothered. And small changes is usually
what we are talking about. The boss might ask for a small change, or I
might notice an easy to fix bug while I'm working on a larger feature.
These things (esp the latter) happen very often.

Furthermore, adding a feature in reality usually involves adding three
different things which should logically be in different commits.
Usually I'll write one or more functions that talks to the database, a
view that interacts with the user, and a controller that lies between
them. For these things it doesn't make sense to say "I'll work on
these in different branches". You need to develop them together, but I
still want to have them in different commits.

Daniel.
-- 
No trees were killed in the generation of this message. A large number
of electrons were, however, severely inconvenienced.