Security

[Daniel Carrera]

On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote:
> Daniel Carrera writes:
>  > Hello,
>  >
>  > Does Bazaar have any cryptographic security guarantees in the style of
>  > Monotone, Git and Mercurial?
>
> Last I heard, only Monotone makes any pretense to security.  Git and
> Mercurial provide a certain amount of automatic integrity checking,
> using a cryptographic quality hash.  Whether that can be
> straightforwardly extended to security is another question; it depends
> a lot on workflows AFAIK.

I really liked the ideas behind Monotone. I tried to use it for a
while but I quit because it was so difficult to undo a commit.

Cheers,
Daniel.
-- 
No trees were killed in the generation of this message. A large number
of electrons were, however, severely inconvenienced.