Comparison with Git, Mercurial or Darcs?
Daniel Carrera
dcarrera at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 10:46:16 GMT 2009
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Mark Williamson <maw48 at cantab.net> wrote:
> <snipped content>
>
>> One correction from your list: Darcs does support renames properly. I
>> was surprised when I learned that Git and Mercurial have to do a
>> delete+add behind the scenes... Ugh...
>
> FWIW, Mercurial does record renames, whereas git does not record them at all.
Thanks, I didn't know that about Git.
Just to make sure I understand you about Mercurial: The Bazaar website
says that when you ask Mercurial to rename, behind the scenes what it
really does is a delete+add. Is this correct? In other words, Bazaar
and Darcs are special in that they actually record a rename as a
rename.
Thanks.
--
No trees were killed in the generation of this message. A large number
of electrons were, however, severely inconvenienced.
More information about the bazaar
mailing list