Improving our review criteria

[Andrew Cowie]

On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 08:33 +1000, Ian Clatworthy wrote:

>  but, right now, I think our review criteria is 
> skewed in favour of 10-20 core developers instead of our user base (80k 
> at a rough guess)

While I think Robert's sentiment that your message hits the problem with
the wrong hammer is probably correct, I'd just like to say that this
comment from Ian's would be useful and illuminating when considering
broader themes (for instance "if I had any choice in the matter, what
would I consider working on next?").

Cheers,

AfC
Sydney

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20091113/2fa0f7b2/attachment.pgp