Usage discussion from the GNU Emacs project.

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 06:38 +0100, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>>
>> (It is worth mentioning that 2.1-b3 required much less memory than 2.0
>> while cloning: 2.0 peaked at 1.0 GB, 2.1-b3 at 340 MB. 2.0 ran on a
>> Kubuntu 9.10 x86_64 machine and 2.1 on a Windows XP 32 bits, so maybe
>> this makes a bit of a difference, but does not explain a 65%
>> reduction). 
> 
> The 32/64 bit difference would explain about 50% of the memory actually,
> based on previous figures.

2.1.0-b3 has my specific memory improvements, which generally drop
memory consumption in half. So coupling the b3 improvements and 64bit vs
32 bit were probably both part of it.

John
=:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksRhwcACgkQJdeBCYSNAANy8ACfRtpjMYxhN5qvZjLElPWeJf7W
fyIAnjer1VrHSTQX8V2D0y/ZbY9h32iT
=AT7b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----