Patch Pilot report

Robert Collins robert.collins at canonical.com
Mon Nov 30 04:16:47 GMT 2009


On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 15:12 +1100, Martin Pool wrote:
> 
> I think, unless and until Launchpad gets a concept of 'responsible
> person' for a review
> <https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+bug/488540>, it
> doesn't make sense for pilots to retain ownership of a patch once
> their week ends.  So I'm going to look at all open reviews, and then
> from next Monday not do any piloting.  Obviously if people have a
> personal interest in a particular patch they can keep looking at it. 

I disagree with this quite strongly; the number of patches to pilot is
pretty small - within a week its very tolerable - and handoffs are where
you get friction such as differences of opinion causing unnecessary
rework.

Its not hard for a pilot to have a tomboy note open with the urls of
things they haven't guided through to 'in' or 'you need to do more
work'.

-Rob
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/attachments/20091130/d1a7d270/attachment.pgp 


More information about the bazaar mailing list