"Co-located branches" by convention

[Alexander Belchenko]

Marius Kruger пишет:
> awesome, thanks Ian!
> I think we need to work towards making this the default for init,
> branch and checkout?!,
> because I think it would resolve a lot of confusion while still being
> very flexible and powerful!
> I think this scales better than what we have in the use case when
> someone checks out something just to check it out and then later
> realises they want to start making feature branches.
> 
> 
> WRT having more than one active working tree, I think there are
> sufficient ways to do it eg:
> 1) You can make a secondary lightweight checkout as a peer of the main
> project checkout
> 2) I don't believe there is anything preventing you from checking out
> more working trees in .bzrbranches/
> 3) There would obviously be options to do it the old way if you really
> prefer this and don't mind the manual overhead.
> 

Or as Stephen pointed out: just made stacked branch outside of light co, 
stacked on corresponding branch from .bzrbranches