Contributor agreement

[Karl Fogel]

David Ingamells <david.ingamells at mapscape.eu> writes:
> On re reading what I wrote I realise I didn't phrase this point very
> well. I found it strange that the agreement contained a commitment to
> sent the agreement by email when the commitment only becomes active
> when that action has already occurred. I also can see no reason to
> constrain a person to one means of transmission - if an individual has
> concerns like I voiced about email why not allow him to send a paper
> copy?

Hunh.  Yeah, that seems strange to me too, but I think it might fall in
the category of "bug too minor to fix".  Lawyer time is valuable, so we
want them working on the big questions!