2.0.3?

[Gordon Tyler]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/14/2009 4:45 AM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
> In the end, I think it means that the only fixes that should land
> on the stable branches should be identified from the start and
> land there or be critical enough to be backported. I don't think
> we have (yet) encountered such bugs for the 2.0 release series.

What if the developer branches from the 2.0 series, fixes the bug,
tests, unit-tests and the proposes for merge into 2.0?

> We have other means than the stable branches to distribute new
> releases (ppas, etc) and that can be used when people are
> interested in new features or bug fixes.

As I understand it, ppas are a Ubuntu packaging thing, right? If that's
so, then bear in mind that leaves out Windows users for getting these
features or bug fixes since they will almost certainly depend on the
binary installers built for releases.

Ciao,
Gordon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLJjs5AAoJEIrPJfWinA2uCucIAIR3y/groo8HyDug8add0kTk
iNmfyElAQUcnMV0rqOCowq2sb4REbf8mAd/eQjEJ4h8hjm0nsCEA6Tysm/6eLT4a
/hFuWNCRTHzYgMUMJ3JfooC8w6guOQmL4iOnzw8GMkeLynOcVBFDBtvOqEAA6VME
/ugwmpBPgn2pX4XSxnfnAvhK8bgKtye0cf2hYMUS9UkLG/BG1PqQqfiRpAJZyUBj
0obQC6SaXHll+wePIePrC3Tu7nOseN+kznXccQHuyJNjbAmqTEPeRSpm33LbZIDj
Y0tQ9h8T+cw9kbXohY5Y+jni6yxyP3vEAJgBt9GbO/mcCA5NZ58SlGyN79m5uU8=
=ZxnX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----