2.0.3?

[Danny van Heumen]

Sorry. Just ignore me. I see in the "Bug Work" section of the 
documentation that this is the default method. I must've missed this 
part when I read the documentation.

Danny


Danny van Heumen wrote:
> I'm not experienced in bzr development yet, but I'm wondering about the 
> following.
> 
> Gordon Tyler wrote:
>> On 14/12/2009 9:19 AM, Vincent Ladeuil wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Gordon" == Gordon Tyler <gordon at doxxx.net> writes:
>>> That's what I call 'fixing in 2.0 from the start': you begin with
>>> a branch that will be cleanly mergeable to the stable branch.
>>
>> Would you say that should be the preferred way of fixing bugs reported
>> on 2.0 versions?
> What about fixing bugs by default in the released (supported) version? 
> (Something like the Daggy Fixes method suggests that was named earlier, 
> although maybe you should not go back as far as the specific revision in 
> which the bug was introduced.)
> 
> It seems to be more profitable since you enhance the stability of 
> released version(s) and the more recent the code is, the more chance 
> there is that you need to resolve conflicts, which seems easier to me 
> since the code is more recent. (Or very hard if the code changed 
> significantly, but then you would probably need to check if the bug 
> still exists.)
> 
> Danny
> 
> 
>