Bazaar 2.1.0 has gone gold

[Alexander Belchenko]

John Arbash Meinel пишет:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Ian Clatworthy wrote:
>> Martin Pool wrote:
>>
>>>> Given 2.1 has gone gold, I guess it's too later to put a "What's New in
>>>> Bazaar 2.1" document into the 2.1 branch itself. :-) If we agree to put
>>>> the effort into writing such a document, putting the 2.1 one into trunk
>>>> (initially) is fine IMO. As long as it exists *somewhere*, we can
>>>> reference it (and the Explorer one please :-) ) in the final 2.1
>>>> announcement.
>>> I think we should have a single summary section under the main
>>> release, describing what's new since the previous major release.
>> It can be a section inside the existing Release Notes, sure. I think it
>> needs to be on a page to itself though as it's the page that people will
>> want to print and read. Perhaps the changes between the last RC and the
>> final .0 release is so small that we could just reuse that section.
>>
>>>> Thoughts? A volunteer to write a first draft?
>>> You? ;-)
>> I was hoping for someone else. :-) If no-one gives it a go overnight,
>> I'll put something together in the morning.
>>
>> Ian C.
>>
>>
> 
> This is what I wrote:
> 
> This release marks our second long-term-stable series. The Bazaar team
> has decided that we will continue to make bugfix-only 2.0.x and 2.1.x
> releases, along with 2.2 development releases.
> 
> This is a fairly incremental update, focusing on polish and bugfixing.
> There are no changes for supported disk formats. Key updates include
> reduced memory consumption for many operations, a new per-file merge
> hook, ignore patterns can now include '!' to exclude files, globbing
> support for all commands on Windows, and support for addressing home
> directories via ``bzr+ssh://host/~/`` syntax.
> 
> Users are encouraged to upgrade from the 2.0 stable series.
> 
> 
> 
> It is my summary blurb for the 2.1 release. If you don't want to include
> the ~100 bugfixes, then I don't know that there is a lot more to say.
> You certainly can go into details about the individual features, but
> your whole point was that you wanted a summary of the primary
> differences between 2.1.0 and 2.0(.4).


Many thanks for this text. I've used this and Martin's article on 
bazaarvcs.wordpress blog to write Russian announce:

http://bzr-day.blogspot.com/2010/02/bazaar-210.html