For how long should we retain Hardy support in our PPAs?

[John Arbash Meinel]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 5/1/2011 12:02 AM, Max Bowsher wrote:
> For how long should we retain Hardy support in our PPAs?
> 
> My motivator for posing this question now is that I've just run into a
> situation with preparing bzr 2.4b2 packages where I need to add a
> backport of quilt to the bzr builddeps PPA and perform additional
> debian/rules tweakage because of hardy's non-support for debian source
> format 3.0.
> 
> I'm guessing we're not quite ready to drop hardy support, given it's an
> LTS, but I would like to open the discussion of when we would feel it's
> appropriate.
> 
> Max.
> 

I would say as long as we are considering backporting via SRUs, which
I'm guessing is ~ as long as it is supported.

John
=:->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2+6hAACgkQJdeBCYSNAANe0gCcD+x7vvp+mhWV+eAGqqfk4u7l
YDEAn3jXV+//bpDLY5KuqnGGyYMq3UeV
=MIob
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----