[Bug 20839] Incompatible with make 3.80+3.81.b3-1

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ubuntu.com bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ubuntu.com
Sun Dec 11 19:47:39 UTC 2005


Please do not reply to this email.  You can add comments at
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20839
Ubuntu | cdbs





------- Additional Comments From debzilla at ubuntu.com  2005-12-11 19:47 UTC -------
Message-ID: <20051211191616.GA6485 at cat-in-the-hat.dnsalias.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:16:18 -0600
From: Ken Bloom <kbloom at gmail.com>
To: 342892 at bugs.debian.org, 342879 at bugs.debian.org
Subject: Possible broken rule

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

is it possible that the broken rule is in
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk?

I see a bunch of rules that look like this:
$(patsubst %,install/%,$(DEB_ALL_PACKAGES)) :: install/%:
        dh_installdirs -p$(cdbs_curpkg) $(DEB_INSTALL_DIRS_$(cdbs_curpkg))

These kinds of rules look like good candidates to interact badly with
the new second expansion. And this rule that I have posted is
consistent with people's failures right after CDBS runs dh_installdirs.

Not that I have any clue what's going on or how to fix it, but I bet a
bazillion DD's are subscribing to this bug, so maybe somone else who
reads it would have an idea.

--Ken Bloom

--=20
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDnHsAlHapveKyytERAvm4AJ9cMgy2nF5+A33VUfsAVjyVCSsS6ACePO/T
2XRfnCMxZkr+41S92lEr3qw=
=MDbg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XsQoSWH+UP9D9v3l--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.




More information about the desktop-bugs mailing list