[Bug 16229] New gconf2 packages lack /usr/lib/GConf/2/

[bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.ubuntu.com]

Please do not reply to this email.  You can add comments at
http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16229
Ubuntu | gconf2





------- Additional Comments From debzilla at ubuntu.com  2005-09-24 15:31 UTC -------
Message-Id: <1127566193.18389.2.camel at arrakis.localnet>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 14:49:53 +0200
From: Josselin Mouette <joss at debian.org>
To: 329915 at bugs.debian.org, Remco Schaar <remco at ch.its.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: Bug#329915: New gconf2 packages lack /usr/lib/GConf/2/

--=-4ywxijom/qHJo0dGItnL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le samedi 24 septembre 2005 =E0 14:31 +0200, Remco Schaar a =E9crit :
> I think the new packaging of gconf2 is lacking the libraries
> in /usr/lib/GConf/2. This is introduced somewhere between 2.10.1-2 and
> 2.10.1-5. This caused some problems on my system while upgrading
> libgsf-gnome-1:
>=20
>=20
>     No such file `/usr/lib/GConf/2/libgconfbackend-xml.so'

Did you upgrade gconf2 in the same run, or at least the same day?

> I created a symlink
>=20
>     /usr/lib/GConf/2   ->   /usr/lib/libgconf2-4/2/
>=20
> which allowed me to upgrade libgsf-gnome-1.

Great, you've just broken your system. When something is wrong, you
should downgrade instead of trying fscked up solutions.
--=20
 .''`.           Josselin Mouette        /\./\
: :' :           josselin.mouette at ens-lyon.org
`. `'                        joss at debian.org
  `-  Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom

--=-4ywxijom/qHJo0dGItnL
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDNUtxrSla4ddfhTMRApvTAJ9GU5GUgeiRLUxrBVZSV0LOfpMYFQCfUTRO
W2aHncbGA80aFwdW00bOpOQ=
=y2JI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-4ywxijom/qHJo0dGItnL--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.ubuntu.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.