Agenda Items for Edubuntu Summit - urgent
Jane Weideman
janew at hbd.com
Tue Jun 21 14:29:32 UTC 2005
Hi all,
If there is more input to the agenda please provide asap, as we need to
finalise it...
Thanks
JaneW
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 11:14 +0200, Jane Weideman wrote:
> Please review this list, and feel free to offer additional topics, or
> suggestions, as well as any relevant input to the already listed topics.
>
> Please also give through to the schedule sequence and discussion
> dependencies, and which topics should be addressed first etc.
>
> We will start with registration and introductions on the Friday.
>
Available Time and revised proposed Format:
* Friday *
08:30 - 09:00 - Registration and introductions
09:00 - 10:00 - Welcome (Mark Shuttleworth))
10:00 - 18:00 - Edubuntu Sessions TBC
18:00 - Close of day - Dinner
* Saturday *
09:00 - 12:30 - Edubuntu Sessions TBC
12:30 - 13:30 - Lunch
13:30 - 16:30 - Edubuntu Sessions TBC
*Sunday*
09:00 - 12:30 - Edubuntu Sessions TBC
12:30 - 13:00 - Close, and farewell. Lunch and then departure.
> _____
>
> Agenda Items for Edubuntu Summit
>
> 1-3 July 2005, London
>
>
> * Skubuntu presentation by Jonathan Carter (and Hilton Theunissen)
>
> * Package Selection and Evaluation – how are packages selected and
> evaluated ? Should involve input from the educators who are
> targetted to use the packages (Paul Flint).
>
> * We need to start looking at the various packages available and
> evaluating them, as well as classifying them in 3-4 categories
> such as Junior Primary (6-8), Senior Primary (9-11), Junior High
> (12-14) and Senior High (15-17) etc.
>
> * This process of evaluation is critical as this is the
> most discussed need for the educational change agent.
> Rather than looking for packages and evaluating
> them, it would be wiser and more effective to build a
> mechanism that
> allows all the educators out there to evaluate packages
> and our job
> becomes tabulating and displaying the evaluations. This
> is a paramount
> importance to the educational community, basically
> because all they really
> do is to evaluate, it is the stuff of their daily lives
> (ever get a bad
> grade? :^). Essentially, no evaluation methodology, no
> Edubuntu.
>
> What we may need is a mechanism similar to what has been
> built to evaluate
> installs. I talked some about this and I feel that this
> evaluation
> capability should be somewhat user intrusive, but should
> allow three
> general goals:
>
> 1. You can tell it to buzz-off and you never see it
> again.
> 2. You can tell it what you think on a casual user
> basis.
> 3. You can get seriously medieval.
>
> The result can be a successful evaluation which is
> communicated in the
> same way as the install evaluations. The same mechanism
> is used (actually
> re-used :^), to get this information back to the
> evaluation process which
> in turn updates the evaluation web site (and
> yadda-yadda).
>
> * Edubuntu Logo and Branding – select and agree on logos to be
> used (get more final images and graphic files from Hennie)
>
> * Edubuntu Documentation (speak to Jerome (jsgotangco))
>
> * Added:
> trunk/edubuntu/
> trunk/edubuntu/EdubuntuAbout/
> trunk/edubuntu/EdubuntuReleaseNotes/
> trunk/edubuntu/EdubuntuSetup/
> trunk/edubuntu/EdubuntuUserGuide/
> Log:www.edubuntu.org
> Edubuntu documentation added on svn ()
>
> * Colin Applegate's step-by-step install guide ..?
>
> * Architectural basics – Oliver Grawert (ogra)
>
> * edubuntu can use ltsp, but could be used even without
> this architecture, is a thin client architecture by
> default desirable ?
>
> * which default desktop environment(s) do we want to
> support ?
>
> * how do we want to implement the educational/scientific
> software and which sets do we want to support (see
> http://udu.wiki.ubuntu.com/Edubuntu for a initial
> list) ?
>
> * which default administrational software will we need
> (class management, scheduling etc.) ?
>
> * what do we do about multimedia apps for video/audio
> editing, composing ?
>
> * "Customer" requirements – Jeff Elkner – Paul Flint
>
> * what is our target audience, what are their specific
> needs (i.e. would edubuntu-elementary,
> edubuntu-highschool, edubuntu-lab metapackages be
> desirable)
>
> * are there special technical requirements we need to
> cover additionally to the ones listed at
> http://udu.wiki.ubuntu.com/ThinClientIntegration?
>
> * how much windows compatibility do we need and in which
> areas (for example wine pre-configurations for certain
> software in vocational schools) ?
> * Presentation by representatives of other edu distros:
>
> * SkoleLinux – Petter Reinholdtsen
>
> * Lliurex - Silvia Caballer
>
> * Interactors - Quim Gil
>
> * (K12)LTSP -Eric Harrison
>
> * etc
>
> _______
>
> This is posted up on the wiki too - if you'd prefer to provide
> your input there.
>
> www.edubuntu.org
>
> Thanks
> --
> JaneW
> _____________
> Jane Weideman
> mobile: +27 83 779 7800
> Canonical Ltd.
>
>
>
--
JaneW
_____________
Jane Weideman
mobile: +27 83 779 7800
Canonical Ltd.
More information about the edubuntu-devel
mailing list