Hiring Edubuntu Staff
Ace Suares
ace at suares.an
Sun Jul 26 05:10:48 BST 2009
Please share with acesuares at gmail.com
thx!
ace
David Groos wrote:
> Jordan, I really appreciate your focus on community and working on
> growing it. As I believe Lns. once said, the thing special about
> Edubuntu isn't the software but the community. I've learned a lot about
> the history of Edubuntu and the community which uses it and has
> developed it. To grow a community one must know the community and while
> there may be a few people here who do know all, is there a page, a
> single page, with an overview of the different categories of community
> members, who they are, their needs, strengths and knowledge?
>
> I've watched these many dozens of e-mails these last few days, pondering
> my role in it all. Still not sure but as a teacher one of my strengths
> is organizing information, 'scaffolding' learning and growing
> communities. So... I propose that we need to increase our arsenal of
> supportive software. Really, the main collaborative tools of this
> community are a wiki, list server, and launchpad, right? We need tools
> with additional affordances. Googledocs is great with it's wysiwyg
> editor, simultaneous editing, easy sharing and versioning. I recommend
> we use this googledoc: http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgschn8x_11gtf4ddgc
> to create an easily editable page to provide an overview of the people
> who make up the community. I'd like to 'share' this document so all
> members of the edubuntu community can edit the document. If you would
> like to edit it, e-mail me and I'll share it with the e-mail you give me.
>
> Yours in Education,
>
> David
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Jordan Mantha <laserjock at ubuntu.com
> <mailto:laserjock at ubuntu.com>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 3:05 PM, R. Scott Belford<scott at hosef.org
> <mailto:scott at hosef.org>> wrote:
> > For what it is worth, it is now nearly a year since I tracked down
> > every key Canonical employee I could find at Linuxworld 2008, both at
> > the conference and at after-hours events, to communicate two
> messages:
> > the state of Edubuntu and its User community was having an *adverse*
> > *impact* on the adoption of gnu/linux in education, particularly in
> > thin-client environments,and that two people should be hired - Gavin
> > and Asmo. As Ace observed, he actually thought Gavin worked for
> > Canonical. I used to think so, too. Asmo has been instrumental at
> > greeting and inspiring new users and help-seekers on this list,
> and he
> > likes Frank Zappa.
>
> Gavin and Asmo are both great guys and I would love to see people like
> them employed to work on Edubuntu. However, Mark Shuttleworth has
> indicated to me that Canonical will not be employing anybody to work
> on Edubuntu for the foreseeable future so I think any paid developers
> are going to have to come from some other source. Edubuntu hasn't had
> a paid developer in over a year and it has shown.
>
> The state of Edubuntu for the last year or so hasn't been that great.
> I don't think anybody involved with the project would disagree. The
> problem has been that every attempt to get development rebooted has
> not gone so well. I don't expect every Edubuntu user to be a bug
> filer, doc writer, packager, etc. but *some* people in the community
> needs to step up to make things happen. There are way more good ideas
> than hands to implement them.
>
> There seems to be this eternal struggle between Edubuntu users and
> developers. Edubuntu users are frustrated with how slow development
> goes and how bugs/issues critical to them are not being addressed.
> They feel like their voices are not being heard and that perhaps
> developers just don't understand their situation. Perhaps they feel
> that Edubuntu's full potential is not being realized, especially if
> they've invested a lot of time, effort, and reputation in Edubuntu.
>
> In contrast, Edubuntu developers see day after day where Edubuntu
> could be improved, where cracks are showing, and where new features
> could be developed but feel powerless to actually do anything about
> it. They are frustrated to see the same complaints time and time
> again. They are demotivated when 19 out of 20 times when a user comes
> to them it is to report a problem, complain about Edubuntu, or even
> attack the quality of their work. They may feel that users
> misunderstand that resources are the limiting factor, not a lack of
> recognition of problem or the desire to fix them. And when they try to
> inspire the user community to contribute towards fixing those problems
> that they are bringing they are met with a lackluster response.
>
> So the question that has been racking my mind for the last two years
> or so is, how do we take these two populations of people who have a
> lot of negative perceptions towards each other and towards Edubuntu
> and turn them into a fun, functional, and productive community that is
> well-placed to be a dominate force for bringing the best open source
> has to offer to the world-wide educational community?
>
> Obviously I don't have a good answer to this as I've spent countless
> hours working on and in the Edubuntu community of the last few years
> and it has not really improved. I do have a few thoughts about what
> possible solutions might look like though. I think there are both
> technical and social solutions that could be involved:
>
> * evaluation of the current state of Edubuntu, what are its current
> strengths and weaknesses?
> * finish the Edubuntu Strategy Document, but maybe trying to involve
> the user community more.
> * perhaps going further and develop a roadmap that outlines
> specific, actionable steps for the next couple releases that
> emphasizes regaining ground in terms of quality and community
> development.
> * analysis of the current development processes and especially the
> barriers to entry for contribution. Some barrier will always exist but
> we should try to remove unnecessary ones
> * assess the user < -- > developer communication channels to see if
> a big disconnect exists
> * encourage a positive, respectful, and constructive community.
> Basically, if all you say is negative you end up just being a grumpy
> negative person. If users can learn to trust that developers do indeed
> want to do the best by their users and if developers can take a step
> back and put themselves in the user's shoes for a bit I think we'd all
> be better off. It's not like we're all running around yelling at each
> other 24x7 but I think we could maybe try to improve the tone on the
> mailing lists and IRC.
> * encourage leadership and taking ownership of Edubuntu tasks
> * develop decent documentation and procedures for handling drive-by
> contributions
>
> I'm sure there are many others but that's what came from the top of
> my mind.
>
> > Some of the Canonical staff who received my message last year are on
> > this list. I hope that someone is listening.
>
> They might be, but there's not a lot Canonical staff can really do at
> this point.
>
> > Oh, and for the record, Most Schools Block IRC Making it an
> Impossible
> > Communication Venue for Teachers Needing Support.
> >
> > With Aloha and Respect and an Undying Passion for the Adoption of
> FOSS
> > in the the K12 Environment
> >
> > --scott
> >
> > --
> > edubuntu-users mailing list
> > edubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com
> <mailto:edubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-users
> >
>
> --
> edubuntu-users mailing list
> edubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:edubuntu-users at lists.ubuntu.com>
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/edubuntu-users
>
>
More information about the edubuntu-users
mailing list